Category Archives: NAMI

Florida Legislative Happenings

Below are legislative happenings for this
upcoming week that may interest you!

 

Monday, March 25  |  Passover, no legislative activity

Tuesday, March 26  |  Passover, no legislative activity

Wednesday, March 27

HOUSE

8:00 am – 10:00 am 

   Criminal Justice Subcommittee (404 HOB)

   Health Quality Subcommittee (306 HOB)

 

10:30 am – 12:30 pm 

   Healthy Families Subcommittee (12 HOB)

 

2:00 pm – 4:00 pm 

 Health & Human Services Committee Morris Hall (17 HOB)

 

 4:30 pm – 6:30 pm 

Health Care Appropriations Subcommittee Webster Hall (212 Knott)

 

 

Rumor is we will be seeing the first draft of the House HHS Budget in this meeting

 

SENATE

9:30 am- 12:00 pm

   Criminal and Civil Justice Approp. Subcommittee (37 SOB)

 

1:00 pm- 3:30 pm

Health and Human Services  Approp. Subcommittee (412 Knott)

 

4:00 pm-6:00 pm

SESSION

Thursday, March 28

HOUSE

8:00 am – 10:00 am 

   Health Innovation Subcommittee (306 HOB)

 

1:30 pm – 3:30 pm 

   Select Committee on PPACA Reed Hall (102 HOB)

 

4:00 pm – 6:00 pm 

   Appropriations Committee Webster Hall (212 Knott)

 

Rumor is we will see the first draft of the entire House budget in this meeting

 

 

SENATE

9:00 am- 12:00 pm

Full Appropriations 412 Knott

Friday, March 29

Good Friday/Easter Break, no legislative activity

The first draft of the Senate Budget will be released Friday afternoon

 

Note: As of 3/22, all committee agendas are still TBA

SAMHSA’s scholarship application to financially support consumers

SAMHSA’s scholarship application to financially support consumers who wish to participate in the 2013 NAMI National Convention is now available. Please distribute the attached application to your members. The application is also available at www.nami.org/convention under “FAQ”.

The following are SAMHSA’s guidelines for the scholarship:

Ø  To be eligible, applicants must be a mental health consumer and a U.S. citizen

Ø  The scholarship will pre-pay the convention registration fee, hotel expenses (based on double occupancy), airfare and per diem (daily allowance for meals and incidental expenses).

Ø  The deadline for submitting the application is April 4, 2013 (no exceptions).

Ø  In order to be considered for a scholarship, applicants must complete and submit an application via U.S. mail postmarked on or before April 4, 2013. No faxed or e-mailed submissions will be accepted.

Ø  Applicants will be notified via email or mail by May 7, 2013 if they have been awarded a scholarship or not.

Ø  Questions about the application can be directed to Jamila Henderson at 703-516-7968  or by email at SAMHSAscholarship@nami.org

 

Please note: Applying for the scholarship does not guarantee a scholarship award.  All required fields must be completed in order to be considered.  SAMHSA reserves the right to decline incomplete applications and the right to cancel the SAMHSA scholarship program at any time.

Visit www.nami.org/convention for more details!

 

Judi Evans, Executive Director
NAMI Florida, Inc
1030 E. Lafayette St.

The House Health Care Appropriations Subcommittee

Thanks to Karen Koch, FCCMH, for capturing this information and reporting it so precise and timely.  I will continue to forward these updates so you can follow the issues as they go through committee.  We will be discussing bills and actions on our Policy call, February 21 at 6pm. 

Click here: Select Committee on Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Committee Page – The Florida Senate

Tuesday, February 12, 2012

The House Health Care Appropriations Subcommittee spent more than an hour discussing managing entities with Secretary Wilkins yesterday.  Representative Matt Hudson, chair announced at the beginning of the Secretary’s presentation that the committee would be permitted to ask questions at each slide of the Secretary’s presentation rather than waiting until the end of the presentation as is the usual procedure.  He stated that he felt it was necessary so that questions that may arise during the presentation could be addressed immediately and not lost at the end. 

It didn’t take Representative Swartz long to ask the first question. 

At the end of the first slide that outlined the department’s responsibilities as they relate to mental health and substance abuse Swartz asked about the department’s recommendations regarding CSU payment methodology. Wilkins asked Rob Siedlecki to answer the questioned. Siedlecki stated that they were proposing a hybrid model which included some utilization analysis but his explanation was very confusing.  Hudson explained to the committee that the question was related to last year’s proviso and that the department had issued a report based on the proviso and if the committee had not seen the report he would make sure they got a copy. He indicated that the department would be back to address the report but Siedlecki indicated that the department did not need legislative authority to make the change.

The next slide was about the individuals the mental health and substance abuse program serves.  This triggered a question from Representative Pafford related to whether the department had supported the Governor’s position of not funding community projects.  When the Secretary responded he did not know what projects or loss of funding Pafford referring to, Pafford responded that it was available on the Governor’s web site.

The Secretary got through 4 – 5 more slides with limited questions but by slide 6 questions from the committee and especially committee chair Hudson began to occur rather rapidly.  Questions varied from why the department did not request new funding to how much funding was lost or shifted to cover funding the managing entities.  Hudson basically drilled the Secretary and at times Siedlecki on issues as specific as how administration cost savings were determined, the duplication of having each ME establish its own IT systems, and even the purpose of universally requiring contract procurement across all services.  Hudson went as far as telling the Secretary that he needed to allow for an anonymous measure from stakeholders regarding how MEs were doing on the ME score card.  Rep. Swartz asked about what the department was doing to analysis the impact of ACA on the department and ME functions in the future of which the Secretary had to admit they haven’t really addressed that issue.

Both the Secretary and Siedlecki had to state many times that they were still in the process of analyzing certain aspects of implementation, for example what are administrative costs or the impact of procurement in rural areas and would expect changes to be made along the way.  The Secretary stated at one point that maybe it was more competitive bidding for “new” services. Representative Wood was the only committee member strongly advocating for procurement.

On the issue of requiring each ME to develop IT systems the Secretary admitted that it was probably not the best way to go and in the future DCF may pull that back. By the end of the presentation Hudson acknowledged that change was not bad but change for change sake was not good. 

The video of the meeting is available at the web site below and I would recommend members listen to it.  The presentations by Secretary Wilkins are the first 2 on the video. Staff will also be following up with questions from committee members and suggest that if you have a relationship with committee members you do so as well.

http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/ VideoPlayer.aspx?value= EE6AKxJwGlp5B1Qwgui% 2f396kDYViQwUqwd78BRtpz5P% 2fTQOJ9fTNaeVpu6ILXWEHvDu2HNq% 2fw5PKOcZuUDcRGlY9% 2fQheiW49t0ggiLtixjoCCvsRS2JN2 CteJA1kSWua7rCnZ7Gaxhs8TXtCJk1 kEvQAW1%2brVzu% 2beTsb7FmFkmhzJ0nqBXEFSJB% 2ftM8KO3kUDOqwwW8pDe6q3VsLbJUi r% 2bxVtVmOh8IwaDdB7qfeeg7d7iZtce 6L9GHz0smnOuRXkRfC%2fjjodHX% 2famaOk6NccYe9UrHAnP0SfpwEetPI qKu7k%2fJul4%2fFTrtzz% 2foD7OmrypbMA5TCmXRqDsUU1hj0dY T74nECvcih% 2bOt1jOUGFCEjKp6dafSaR2n32AVfa qltuTV89aez3MXbE6tbm8N6tisMLhS %2f%2bZudH%2byPtMWKw% 2bePcN63LhtmYTOLCjKjBy3j6iZsBi khET6dYytqiXyMwiYtyIewHwP6cxBm X9yFGhFcO7cOOBeNb% 2fMF2PfI6PB5ORgX4zSkrG% 2fp0DyVrQLwHM% 2f1oOwc3Eh1usgJ7z0Xp9DAGw5I2sf S6gzj% 2fg3xNR2eLiIUT6lwJCIEiA8SJpNok RckDKNt4vpq6E7vRBP9coRrhGXxjFy weFO1ba6xREId

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

2:00 – 4:00 p.m. — House Healthy Families Subcommittee  will be taking up HB 317 related to forensic mental health and providing for rights of persons committed under ch. 916 F.S. The event is available live on the Florida Channel.

3:30 – 5:30 p.m. – Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services has a full agenda including a discussion regarding the implementation of DRGs.  The Council’s area of interest will be the review of the state’s agencies proposed budget reductions and the interest of committee members in taking any of the proposed reductions as a way to address President’s Gaetz’s requirement to each appropriations committee to find cost savings. This event is available live on the WFSU-TV – The FLORIDA Channel webcast.

 

Judi Evans, Executive Director

“Behavioral Health” to “Stigma and Discrimination” in NAMI’s Public Policy Platform

Report on Council Feedback

Addition of statement on “behavioral health” to “Stigma and Discrimination” in NAMI’s Public Policy Platform

Final Report – April 25, 2012

Fifty-three individuals responded with feedback.

  • 17 percent are state presidents,
  • 28.3 percent are executive directors,
  • 13.2 percent are Consumer Council members,
  • 15.1 percent are Veterans and Military Council members and
  • 26.4 percent are not affiliated with any of the four councils.

Leaders were given three options to describe their opinion of the proposed changes: “Support“, “Support with reservations” and “Do not support“.

  • 83 percent (44 individuals) said they support the changes,
  • 11 percent (6 individuals) said they “support with reservations” and
  • 6 percent (3 individuals) did not support the changes.


Comments:

  1. Reviewed by our Board. Looks good to us.
    ~ Gay H, executive director, NAMI Pinellas (Fla.)
  2. Everything in the revisions represent every activity that NAMI is involved with, which is all improving the lives of all people with mental illness.
    ~Anonymous Consumer Council member
  3. I wholeheartedly agree with the proposed revisions. Unfortunately, the military forces need to do so much more to help our active duty members before they become veterans.
    ~Char C, Veterans and Military Council member
  4. I am glad the board is going to put this through. I think it should have been done years ago. Good Job!!!!
    ~Tom S
  5. Strongly support NAMI stance on excluding the words “behavioral” when referring to individuals with mental disorders.
    ~Anonymous
  6. I wholeheartedly agree with the statement on behavioral health!
    ~Barbara C
  1. I do have a small issue with the choice verbiage. I know a lot of behaviors and actions are hard to control but I also don’t think we can say that not taking personal responsibility from their actions is correct either. As a consumer I can’t always control my actions but in some cases I can and there are consequences for my actions. On the issue of serving in the military I do think you have to take someone’s mental health situation into consideration. Factors that can cause a person to obtain standing effects from war, or already having a pre-existing condition can be a major factor. I think it can more detrimental to a person serving than not continuing in the military.
    ~Anonymous Consumer Council member
  2. I agree 100% with the statements in the policy and the rationale behind it, specifically that the term “behavioral health” is stigmatizing. Virginia is moving towards the term “behavioral health” and it concerns me for the very reasons expressed in the proposed policy revision.
    ~Mira S, executive director, NAMI Virginia
  3. I agree 100%.
    ~Linda W
  4. Although there is a large segment of those who have mental health conditions who can tie them to biological factors, this excludes many who – develop mental health issues as a result of their environment and trauma. In addition, this focus on biology has been proven to have a more stigmatizing effect on some in that it puts things, in the “medical model” framework. Meaning, there is a “disorder” (another stigmatizing term) that is permanent, leaving an individual “damaged.” The statement can be improved by including positive alternatives. It starts out by stating what they condemn, but what is missing is what they would praise or want to see. (For example, condemning the linkage with violence is appropriate – but there is a need to follow that up with the need for more positive portrayals showing people living well, and living successful lives.) The term “behavioral health” – does not move the conversation forward because it does not offer a more positive alternative. Overall our feeling of the statement is that it sounds overbearing, rather than positive – which is really where we need to go here. My hope for the completion of the statement is that, moving forward, peers would be driving its language and purpose.
    ~Anonymous executive director
  5. I think it is time to move beyond the word stigma. Stigma is a very much misunderstood word, and historically a stigma is owned by the person who is different.. the reality of mental illness is much of our community is at best ignorant at worst discriminatory. Lets call it what it is. and not use language that most folks don’t understand, whether intentional or not.
    ~Greg G, executive director, NAMI Lee County (Fla.)
  6. I agree with the proposed revisions and the reasoning for making them.
    ~Sherry C
  7. Behavioral Health does not describe the situation at all. If a person is mentally ill they are mentally ill.
    ~Jerry F
  8. I have always been uncomfortable with the term “Behavioral Health.” Thank you for clarifying why that term is not acceptable.
    ~Deb N, executive director, NAMI Central Iowa
  9. I fully agree with the NAMI statement; the term, “behavioral health”, implies that mental illnesses are only behavioral and can be overcome.
    ~Jackie S
  10. re: Behavioral Health – Change may hurt more than helps. The meaning that emerged through the years does not indicate that mental illness behavior is willful. Term behavioral health refers to health maintenance and prevention of illness.
    ~Carole J, executive director, NAMI Lake County (Ohio)
  11. This is a great and much needed addition to our Public Policy. The term “Behavioral Health” is very stigmatizing and says nothing about mental illness being about moods, thoughts, perceptions etc. We could take it one step further and support the development of another term that more aptly describes these disorders.
    ~Carol C, executive director, NAMI Montgomery County (Pa.)
  12. Yeah! We hate the term “behavioral health” and are working on getting all our hospitals to stop using it.
    ~Anonymous executive director
  13. Comment from board member: If NAMI is going to condemn the use of Behavioral Health they are obligated to come up with what terms are acceptable.
    ~Anonymous executive director
  14. This belief statement is too one-sided identifying only the brain/body perspective of mental illnesses. perhaps a more balanced statement, or softer wording could be used to leave open the fact that diagnosed individuals are responsible to work on recovery and be planful in attending to early warning symptoms to avoid destructive behaviors that we have demonstrated in the past and continue to be responsible for today.
    ~Catherine R, Consumer Council member
  15. If this is something that is adopted as a NAMI position, I think that would be wonderful. I would hope that you will notify all NAMI orgs and affiliates so that we can use this policy as a guide for our work. I wonder if this position is adopted, how that will effect the information that NAMI publicizes and the collaborations that NAMI makes with other orgs? Behavioral Health is used currently so widely by other groups. If this is NAMI’s position, will we still promote and support initiatives, trainings, resources, etc that use the BH term? Thanks.
    ~Anonymous executive director
  16. Yes!!! Finally! Finally someone speaking out against the term “behavioral health”! Your thoughts on this issue express my thoughts exactly! The use of that term is very stigmatizing and connotes that we consumers “behave” bad.(P.S.- I am a member of Nami and also of Nami Connections, though am not on any council. )
    ~Marsha A
  17. Looks good to me.
    ~Anonymous Consumer Council member
  18. I support the position. Would be helpful if we had a proposal for those who improperly portray and discriminate against those with mental illness on how they could address the mental illness issue without stigma or discrimination. I must admit that I do not have the words for the proposal, but would be eager to either see what others have proposed or work to create a sound and well considered proposal.
    ~Mike S
  19. Behavioral Health for State of Louisiana is still at such a stalemate as for as Stigma. Meaning, treatment by with and for workers not wanting to be involved in Co-Occurring treatment. Federal dollars are and have been discriminating across disabilities, with mental health organizations creating Stigma over said dollars.
    ~Denver N, Consumer Council member
  1. We deal with the behavioral stigma with our state legislators. It is time that they, and the general public, learn that mental illness is a disease, not a behavior.
  2. ~Margaret Ballard
  3. I never liked the term “behavior health.”
    ~Tom W
  4. I agree with the statement, but I don’t think this is a battle worth fighting when so many other things are more important and when we can’t do anything to people who continue to use the term, some of whom are our friends.
    ~Anonymous state president
  5. The term behavioral health has bothered me ever since it became the new in terminology. Thank you for addressing this and hopefully leading the charge to get rid of it.
    ~Kim S, president, NAMI Oregon
  6. Excellent!
    ~Patti Jo S, president, NAMI Wisconsin
  7. Stigma, which family members endure, was brought up at one of our recent meetings. Should a statement be made concerning the stigma that family members face?
    ~Anonymous state president
  8. NAMI further believes that mental illness is a medical condition, biological in nature, which involves psychological processes such as cognition, emotion, temperament and motivation and which disrupts a person’s thinking, feeling, mood, ability to relate to others and capacity for coping with the ordinary demands of life. NAMI does not favor using the inaccurate term “behavioral health”, as the very term obscures and hinders effective treatment and can add to the stigma and discrimination endured by people living with a mental illness and co-occurring disorders.
    ~Silvia A, executive director, NAMI Puerto Rico
  9. Very well done; thank you. I do, however, have two comments: 1) Some times mental illness is used; other times the term mental illnessES is used. Perhaps, the terms should be consistent throughout the document. 2) It is said that NAMI “believes…”. I would respectfully suggest using a stronger word such as CONVINCED.
    ~Sherry G, president, NAMI New York State
  10. The stigma and nonsense must stop; lives are being lost because of it….mine almost several times. I am a former missionary to Guatemala for twenty years and showed no signs of Bipolar until an MA at University of Penn. I finished the MA and returned to the field. I ended up in Wi by accident but have become “manic” (fine) in my advocacy.
    ~Julie S, chair, Wisconsin Consumer Council
  11. This is well put together and seems like a lot of time and effort was put into this to get the wording just right. It’s clear concise and should make sense to any one that is reading this.
    ~ James B, Veterans and Military Council member
  12. I do not think that ‘primarily biological’ is correct; rather it be worded ‘primarily biological and environmental’.
    ~Kyle L, Veterans and Military Council member

Peer Scholarship deadline extended to May 4th!

 www.namiflorida.org The NAMI Florida Consumer Counci

peer.jpg

Good morning all,

 

Please see the email below from the Peer Conference Chair, Dana Foglesong.  The scholarship deadline has been extended to May 4th!  Please share this with your members and community partners.  There are still plenty of scholarships available.  If you have any questions please feel free to call our office or email to jevans (at) namiflorida.org.

 

CEU’s available…………

 

 

 


From: danabirdsongfl (at) gmail.comSent: 4/22/2012 10:25:01 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time
Subj: Peer Scholarship deadline extended to May 4th!

 

The scholarship deadline for peers who need financial assistance to attend the 3rd Annual Peer Conference has been extended to May 4th! Please note, there are still about 100 scholarships still available so PLEASE FORWARD.

 

Attached is the scholarship application as well as the general registration form.

 

Thank you!

Dana Foglesong

Chair, 3rd Annual Peer Conference